, 2011 The first entry comes a bit later than it had wanted, but I been celebrating the New Year in style with a Christmas tradition to which I am more regular: the monumental trancazos. No, seriously, when I say monumental'm talking about a cold on the size of Krak des Chevaliers, a few viruses with the same force as the arm of Roland and congestion able to pull away the walls of Constantinople.
But to start the year and looking forward for renewal and all that, I opted for natural, rehashing news from a couple of weeks! It is good to have a blog of history, that if you do not offer highly topical content that is not going to sink the world.
remember ...
end of 2010 burned the Internet in English on the occasion of the Law Sinde, making me recall one more time, to Jacques le Goff when he said that we are living in the Middle Ages, but this time, literally. Why?
Those who live in Spain and will know well what is the law and everyone will Sinde and his own opinion, but any reader I have that is not here and all this will sound like Chinese. If you can read this this or other . And if I explain it, clearly biased, that's what my bloj:
after the sentencing judges systematically download web sites (which the media calls "illegal") not committed any crime, and the Attorney General's Office said that if there was profit to share copyright-protected content was perfectly legal, the SGAE (the employers of some creative and cultural industries) decided to go around saying that things were being unloaded and the broadcast and link were pirates, thieves and they were stealing, and they decided to push for a law (or an article of a law) to jump over the judges left the decision to shut down sites in the hands of an administrative body, an article recently knocked in Congress. Lying
Law, SGAE and their minions keep saying that download Cosic is theft, crime and all that.
Well, read on the subject I found this:
Constrained non EUAs be no ome, which Fagan sues another, plus the EUA fazer her will if she so desires, you were therefore in things mentioned, quel to the right as Judgadores urge to fazerla. E one Dell is, when one is being praised, and in saying to another, which is his servant (a); to enfamado, by saying the other evil in the omes. Ca in such things how are you, or other similar Dellas, against whom are these, can r Judge of Logar, and request that constrain a quel that he said, that demand sobrellas in juyzio Fagan, and that PrUEVE or that is unbecoming to Dell, quel Fagan another amendment, the Judgador qual understand to be cooked. E if rebel fuesse adventure that pleases non fazer demand, after the scourge judgador demands, we say that EUAs taken for remove other forever, so that he nin nol another facer can claim on such grounds as this . Et even say that if later dende turns to that of the evil that before had said, should take warning quel gelo judgador so than anyone else dares to enfamar non nin to speak evil of tortious homes.
Alfonso X of Castile, called the Wise, in Part III, Title II, Act 46
What the hell does this have to do with the discs get off Yes ?
Alfonso X the Wise, was King of Castile between 1252 and 1284, won Cadiz, he rebelled Murcia, played a lot of chess, had family problems with his children and was a great promoter of the culture industry his time with the so-called Toledo School of Translators (no such school, were freelancers) until he was in the race to be named Holy Roman Emperor, but above all he is remembered by the parties, an important body of law for his time who sought to unify the laws of the kingdom.
The Act 46 of these items is to set the "Action Boast" that " is precisely that which can be brought against one who claims to have a claim against you but, paradoxically, does not promote any legal action claim it. In this way, this route serves to bind people say to reclaim a particular right to be exercised at once or that otherwise forever hold your peace. The sentence would end with such a procedure would clarify whether or not flaunt who boasted that right or not and, otherwise, you will prevent re-raise or extra judicial same issue "(seen here ) Let
that if a "pirate" Boast Action exercised, it would be forcing the industry of content pages that link closures arising necessarily before the ordinary courts (the same judges that the Act was intended to circumvent Sinde) . If the court decision continues the path traced by the multiple previous resolutions and declares that there is no violation vaunted intellectual property rights, the ruling would prevent the industry back to ask the same question before any court (including administrative law wants imposed Sinde).
scrotumtightening What is that in 1988 the Supreme Court held that the Law of the thirteenth century still in force, ruling that " the jurisprudence of this room has declared the validity of the law merited as 46 to the effects of its own, which which boasts of a right is exercised in the term and set him to do so is imposed perpetual silence .
suspect this will not happen by mere curiosity, but frustrate the SGAE invoking a thirteenth century king would be something I would restore faith in the human species. And they say that the Middle Ages contributed nothing to history.
0 comments:
Post a Comment