Canada Visa For Alaska Cruise

not call me "Eros and Civilization Marcuse


The other day I was reviewing "Eros and Civilization Marcuse (Seix Barral 9 th ed. 1976). Some quick comments:

- I disagree with the pejorative conception of the concept of Nirvana is patent in this syllogism that underlies Freud's theories (p. 37)

life instinct (Eros) -> Pleasure Principle -> Top of Nirvana -> Death Instinct (Thanatos)

When you really think it must be

life instinct (Eros) -> Pleasure Principle -> Top of Nirvana -> Flair Unity and Wholeness (Consciousness).

***
- Marcuse Should not link the concept of "surplus repression" to Marx's "surplus value"? (P. 48). ***


- In the latest theory of Freud metapiscología "instincts [...] [...] are defined as a driving force that gives life a process direction (Richtung) defined, considering as principles of life (p. 39) Can you read teleological key this in?

***
- In light of the idea of \u200b\u200ba non-repressive sublimation, Freud's definition of Eros as a battle for the living substance form in ever larger units, so that life can be extended and taken to a higher development (p. 197) reaches a new meaning. The biological drive is extended by a cultural impulse: again "is a sense in the evolution of the universe?, does consciencia?

-----------------------------------------------


The other day I was reviewing "Eros and Civilization” Marcuse (Seix Barral 9 th English ed.1976). Here some quick comments:

- I disagree with the pejorative conception of the concept of Nirvana that is evident in this syllogism that underlies Freud's theories (p. 37)

Life instinct (Eros) -> Pleasure Principle -> Nirvana Principle -> Death Instinct (Thanatos)

When I really think it should be

Life instinct (Eros) -> Pleasure Principle -> Nirvana Principle -> Desiree of Unity and Wholeness(Consciousness)

.

***
- Should not Marcuse link the concept of "surplus repression" to Marx's "surplus value"?(P. 48).

***
- In the late Freud's meta-psychology theory of "instincts [...] [...] are defined as a driving force that gives life a defined process direction (Richtung) , considering as principles of life (p. 39) Can you read this in teleological key?

***
- In the light of the idea of a non-repressive sublimation, Freud's definition of Eros as a struggle to form the living substance into ever larger units, so that life can be prolonged and brought to a higher development (p. 197) to a whole new meaning. The biological drive is extended by a cultural impulse: again "is a direction in the evolution of the universe?, Consciousness Is That?